THE EUROPEAN CW ASSOCIATIONEuCW/AGCW QRS PARTY |
RESULTS OF THE 2012 EuCW/AGCW QRS PARTY
Results Class A (over 5W RF) Call QSOs Pts Club G4LHI 100 99.2 FISTS Award Winner RD9CX 95 93.0 RUQRP Award Winner G0EML 76 73.2 FISTS Award Winner RW3AI 60 59.4 RUQRP OH5FNI 48 42.8 FISTS M0DRK 37 36.8 FISTS OG9R 35 35.0 AGCW ON6NA 25 24.0 BQRP 2E0JCY 21 20.2 FISTS OE3KAB 20 19.8 OECWG HB9DEO 15 14.6 HTC G0ILN 14 13.4 FISTS DF2ZY 11 11.0 AGCW G3ZOD 10 10.0 FISTS DL1DXL 9 8.8 AGCW DL1AH 3 3.0 AGCW HB9EWO 2 2.0 HTC -- IK2RMZ 82 CKLOG AGCW Results Class B (up to 5W RF) Call QSOs Pts Club DK3UZ 57 57.0 AGCW Award Winner 2E0DPH 44 43.2 FISTS Award Winner G0OTT 24 24.0 GQRP Award Winner PA3AFF 8 7.2 BQRP UU7JF 2 2.0 RUQRP Results Class C-SWL: No entrants. Results Club Championship Pts Club 382 FISTS Award Winner (PDF award to ECM@FISTS) 240 AGCW 159 RUQRP 42 GQRP 39 BQRP 20 OECWG 17 HTC Results Most Readable Morse (MRM) Pts Call 374 OG9R (op OH7QR) Winner of the MRM award 194 2E0DPH 132 G3ZOD 100 M0DRK 95 G4LHI 85 G0EML 82 DK3UZ 60 2E0JCY 46 RW3AI 37 G0OTT 35 OE3KAB 20 DL1AH 15 DL1DXL Many more received votes which got lost because the nominees did not send in a log. Scoring Procedures: QSO Points: The calculation of the QSO score was done as follows: A QSO is considered to have 4 basic elements: Call, RST, Name, QTH. A good call is worth 0.4 points, the other elements are worth 0.2 points. Missing, miscopied, or misspelled element lead to a minor reduction of the score. The idea behind this is that an error free QSO is worth more than a QSO with errors but that a QSO with errors is still worth a lot more than no QSO at all. The exchange of club names and club numbers or other info is not relevant since it is trivial to look up these data and because double membership may cause confusion. Additional info could create credit for SWLs though, and some ops did faithfully repeat all data. Penalties: No penalties were given. A small numbers of dupes were just subtracted. Club Scores: Each class winner has been assigned a percentage value of 100. The other participants were assigned lower percentages according to their QSO numbers compared to the winners' QSO numbers. These percentage points were simply added on a per club basis. This gives QRP clubs a fair chance to get good results and fosters SWLing. Most Readable Morse scores: Each nominee receives a score according to the QSO number of the participants who nominated him. This gives more weight to those who have run many QSOs which is fair enough because they have a bigger pool of candidates to choose from. These nominations are subjective, of course. Please keep in mind that the use of elbugs is allowed. A correct elbug CW is a good as can be, so please don't consider the closeness to a computer fist to be the one and only criterion. This is not a comparison of CW hand writings. If you want that, try the EuCW Straight Key Day in June. Instead, choose nominees who are friendly, patient, helpful to beginners, or who are able to have an interesting talk and who are responsive to questions, or who show ham spirit otherwise. It's rather a general beauty contest and you decide what is beautiful. Some just voted for their friends and there is nothing wrong with it. It's always good to have friends. Some friends did even take the time to boost the scores of their friends by band hopping. One participant mad 18 QSOs with the same station distributed over five days and five different bands. Notes: Awards: I ask award winners whether they prefer an electronic award or a paper award. The tradition imposes that the three best scores win an award and that there is a single MRM award for the highest ranking call who sent in a log. To be eligible for an award I set a threshold of an average of 3 QSOs per day in B-QRP and 5 QSOs per day in the A-QRO and SWL classes. Soapbox (in chronological order): M0DRK: thanks for this enjoyable activity G3ZOD: not that many QSOs, but they were very enjoyable - quality not quantity! G4LHI: I thoroughly enjoyed it as always & a pleasure to meet up with old & new friends again during the week, Its so nice to have good friendly CW chats, with none of this 599/73 & away contest events, which I detest, mostly PC to PC QSO's anyway hi. PA3AFF: Was only QRV on 40m for short time. G0OTT: My key for the week was my Kent brass pounder. I was active after work in the evening and enjoyed my time with the activity, spending most of my time calling around the Fists and QRP frequencies, much qrm from digital at 7.035, did manage a few qso's. Must be upsetting for new comers to be returned by 25+ wpm when calling QRS, this happened a few times during the week! It was my first time active during this event, look forward to next year. HB9DEO: Die QRS-Woche machte mir viel Spass. Dank der "Frequency Activity Centers" konnte ich wirklich QRS-Qsos fahren. Man konnte sich finden wie nie zuvor. Die meisten Ops hatten Zeit fuer ein gemuetliches QSO. UU7JF: Sorry, no match time for air working, but some two way straight key qso was made 2E0DPH: I must say that I enjoyed the event very much even though work commitments prevented me from giving it the full attention I would have liked. G0ILN: I thought to enter the EuCW QRS would be a good way to get back to amateur radio. I really enjoyed my contacts and was surprised how easily the qso format came back to me. My sending was in a lot of cases automatic just like driving your car to work and not remembering the journey! Personal remarks: IK2RMZ: I was active in the QRS week but I declared my log a checklog and I am not eligible to receive MRM points. However, I added my QSO number to the CW club of my choice and I voted in the MRM. My votes went to one who showed so much ham spirit to copy the handwritten log of a friend to a PC, and to the one who had the highest count of Reverse Beacon Spots - that's the one who spent most time waiting for QRS QSOs I suppose. My wish for the future: Come back next year, please. It was fun. Next time, please include both RSTs... :-)Privacy Policy